-
PUBLICVEHICULARTRAVEL.COM
-
Basics
- Interpretation, application of law to fact, and
due process:
Introduction
to the basics - IF YOU ARE NOT A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL
- OR - If you're learning from leaders or
teachers in some movement, it would serve
you immensely to read everything in the order in
which you encounter it. I will build in layers for
you (dianatic application of law to fact/policy)
a foundation of basics, maxims, canons of statutory
interpretation, standards of due process, and limitations
of authority of the three branches of government.
This will give you the understanding of legislative
authority and of how law enforcement and the courts
simply disregard our legislatures. Without an understanding
of these basics you'll be unable to move to the
fast track of learning enjoyed by the authors' students.
Rules to litigate by:
1.
You cannot read too much case law! Read
all of the U.S. Supreme Court and appellate decisions
you can lay your hands on, begin with the most
frequently infringed rights in the Bill of Rights.
For example, denial
of counsel - read all of the cases
cited here for a precursory understanding
of when that 6th Amdt. right has been violated.
2.
Stop learning from incompetent and ignorant people!
Learn to type, sue a public servant in small claims
court, learn the system and learn whose boss is responsible
for misconduct, form a group and do a test case where
you are sure that the police will blow it, confidence
can only come from practice and responsible instruction,
learn to plead in a way that gets respect from the court.
3.
Choose your battles wisely. Can you afford bail,
can you pay the ticket, can you effectively engage the
prosecution??? If not, don't drive without insurance,
don't take your plates off, etc.
4.
WHENEVER gov't starts a case against you, in
court, make requests for disclosure as the court rules
allow. IN ADDITION, make the same request in a different
document under your state's disclosure act, like a state
level Freedom Of Information Act. This way, if disclosure
is not made it's not only a violation of court rules,
but it also constitutes an act of official misconduct
(gross misdemeanor in WA) over which you can file a
citizen's criminal complaint.
5.
Recuse any judge at any time. Did the judge allow
a violation of court rule? Start a controversy over
it naming the judge (small claims, complaint to bosses
to get judge fired, etc.) and attach as exhibit to affidavit
of prejudice claiming loss of the appearance of
fairness entitlement under due process clause.
Please
make a note of it, it works!
***As
you view the contents of this private database note
how it claims at all times that the law is perfect.
Between this database and the one at ToCongress.com
you see how statute alone has finally separated
the individual from the Internal Revenue Code, and
of the motor vehicle codes in fifty states; right
to travel, right to free labor. The answers have
always been right inside the law itself.
The
Revised Code of Washington is abbreviated"RCW."
I am claiming that my "public vehicular
travel" is not a privilege granted by the State,
but rather that it is a common right, that the highways
are "open as a matter of right" to my
"public vehicular travel." WE ALL KNOW
that my use of the streets cannot be both such things
(common right, state granted privilege) at the same
time. WE NOW HAVE statutes and ordinances from throughout
the U.S. saying EXACTLY THIS!!!
Executive/judicial
branches, cops, judges and prosecutors say -
"Washington
highways are open to the use of personal automobiles
only when the owner or operator of the personal automobile
has applied for and received a license to exercise the
state granted privilege of operating a motor vehicle
upon the highways of Washington state."
RCW
46.30.010 Legislative intent. It is a privilege
granted by the state to operate a motor vehicle
upon the highways of this state.
But
we say -
"Highways
are open as a matter of right to public vehicular
travel."
Here is where the patriot bashers (Quatloos.com,
others) will erupt in laughter in elation over the
body strewn traffic court (battle filed) where countless,
well intentioned but tragically [schooled] citizens
have attempted in futility to convince a corrupt
judiciary that they should be secure in their rights.
Here is where they will be proven wrong because
the law says exactly this:
"Highways
are open as a matter of right to public vehicular
travel."
FACT: This phrase is absolutely
everywhere, in state statutes, county and city ordinances
of every type and on every topic.
Are
you "operating a motor vehicle" when you
drive to work, to the store, or to a friend's house?
What does state law say when it defines what a "motor
vehicle" is?
"Motor
vehicle” shall include all vehicles or machines
propelled by any power other than muscular, used
upon the public highways for the transportation
of freight, produce or any commodity . .
.
“Transportation. The movement of goods or persons from
one place to another, by a carrier. Interstate Commerce
Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 14 S.Ct. 1125,
38 L.Ed. 1047.” Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.
|
|